. PATENT .
NOTICE OF ENTITLEMENT
There is quite a story behind this document! Just after I'd applied for patent* I experienced problems with "my" Patent Attorney, Robert MILLER, of SPRUSON & FERGUSON (Sydney CBD office). I very clearly understood that Robert was acting in co-operation with my co-inventors, Cornelis BAAS (now deceased) and Wallace Frederick SMALLWOOD.
* 16th of October in 1992 In short I did not trust Robert MILLER one bit! (I have since been told that Robert has been transferred to the Singapore office of SPRUSON & FERGUSON, obviously to keep him out of the way, but I don't keep track of him!)
A little more than two years after applying for patent, soon after my wife's death, Robert MILLER expressed his condolances during a telephone conversation but the real reason for raising this matter of my wife's death was to mention that I was required to execute (sign) a document transferring the rights to the invention to a partnership between myself and my late wife. I did as he asked and returned the document to him at SPRUSON & FERGUSON (Sydney office). It wasn't until later that I realised that I did not initiate mention of my wife's death and also I am absolutely certain that I would not initiate any personal conversation with Robert as I mis-trusted him from the previous incident with the co-inventors (he clearly had done something which favoured them).
The reason for Robert MILLER raising the issue was so that my ex-brother-in-law could remain silent on the matter, about properly recording the transfer of the rights to the invention, to this new partnership between myself and my wife's estate - and therefore it would appear as if the executors of my wife's estate had taken no interest in these patents! A partnership between two people is ended on the death of one of the partners therefore this partnership, called "PINK ENTERPRISES", needed to be re-established in order for the "silent" transferral of the rights to the FACE EMPLACED Services Support invention to take place. One of the advantages for the executors to my wife's estate with this partnership "PINK ENTERPRISES" was that one partner can commit the partnership with respect to the business of the partnership - without the knowledge of the other party to the partnership! I was an executor de son tort** but due to several solicitors I attempted to have represent me doing their collective best to disenfranchise me of my rights I did not become an executor to my wife's estate! The solicitors not co-operating with me was important in the scheme of things because if I was to become an executor to my wife's estate then I was entitled to receive all infomation pertaining to the settlement of this estate and this "silence" was therefore cancelled!
** nominated in the will but did not apply to the for Probate together with my ex-in-laws
Before this the transferral of the rights to this FACE EMPLACED Services Support invention to the partnership between myself and my late wife's estate I was advised to do so by my ex-brother-in-law, Brian Lesley Joseph BUFFIER, for income tax minimisation purposes. Brian was "my" accountant and re-activating the partnership "PINK ENTERPRISES" would enable me to obtain the taxation benefit of being able to deduct losses from the invention from my income! At first there appears to be no link between the patent attorney and my ex-brother-in-law but the fact that the patent attorney was apprised of my wife's death means there was at least an indirect link between them - in fact my ex-brother-in-law had admitted earlier that he had met the then-head of SPRUSON & FERGUSON - Fraser OLD! (Apart from this, at least indirect link between the patent attorney and my ex-brother-in-law, BHP had their eyes on these patents for some time and there would have been numerous telephone conversations and meetings between them and the patent attorney would have been kept up to speed also.)
I had one rather unusual incident was when I was telephoned on my mobile phone by BULLIVANTS Newcastle when I was attending the after-ceremony function for the funearal of my mother-in-law at my ex-sister-in-law's residence - these BHP rats have no respect whatsoever! BHP would have known my location through global positioning but they would not have known the significance of the visit to my ex-sister-in-law's unless they were told by the ex-in-laws or had their telephones tapped (which would be very likely - the BHP rats would not have trusted the BUFFIER rats!). I had not attempted to contact by BHP or BULLIVANTS for some time therefore the telephone call was "out of the blue"!
The advantage the perpetrators of this fraud gained by using this vehicle "PINK ENTERPRISES", combined with conspiring with all of the solicitors I contacted who I'd hoped would represent me properly, is negated somewhat by the sheer greed of the people involved in this conspiracy. These perpetrators could not help themselves to conduct other frauds and they are glaringly apparent! The BHP share_price should have sky-rocketed after the 2nd of July in 1997 and this rapid decline is quite anomalous! Apart from this there are a few other plus one billion dollar frauds described in detail on the BHPstinks.com web-site!
There was another attempt by Robert MILLER to transfer the rights of this FACE EMPLACED Services Support invention to my ex-in-laws. This involved Robert sending me an authority to appoint patent attorneys in Poland to act on my behalf. If the headings from the page were cut-off then there was left just an assignment for the rights to this invention to Brian BUFFIER and Barbara O'BRIEN without any payment whatsoever to myself!
After this experience I understand that those who are members of the CBD set; solicitors and judges, the media, watchdog authorities, Union Leaders, big businessmen and politicians of every stripe, are just there to strip the population of their wealth and rights!
. www.CBDset.com .